BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 81-87, April 2009

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention

  • Daniel T. Smith, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Stephen R. Jackson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Chris Rorden, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Dr. Chris Rorden, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208.

Received 2 April 2008; received in revised form 28 May 2008; accepted 31 July 2008. published online 06 October 2008.

Summary 

Voluntary eye movements and covert shifts of visual attention activate the same brain regions. Specifically, the intraparietal sulcus and the frontal eye fields (FEF) appear to be involved both with generating voluntary saccades as well with attending to a peripheral spatial location. Furthermore, these regions appear to be required by both tasks—functional disruption of these regions impairs both tasks. Therefore, it appears that the targeting system that allows us to plan saccades is the same system that allows us to covertly track peripheral visual information. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that these brain regions are also activated when participants engage in auditory spatial attention tasks. However, it remains unclear whether these regions are required by these tasks. We used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to disrupt the FEF while participants performed an auditory localization task. On each trial, a visual cue directed attention to the probable laterality of the auditory target, and the participant decided whether the subsequent target sound came from an upper or lower speaker. In the absence of TMS, individuals were faster to respond to targets that occurred on the cued side (valid trials) than when the target appears contralaterally to the cued side (invalid side). TMS interfered with this effect, such that the costs associated with ipsilateral invalidly cued targets were substantially reduced. These results suggest that the eye-movement system is needed for normal auditory attention.

Keywords: frontal eye fields, endogenous attention, reaction times, humans, audition

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Rorden was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS054266).

PII: S1935-861X(08)00324-0

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.005

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 81-87, April 2009