BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Pages 383-385 , October 2008

Broca's area is crucial for visual discrimination of speech but not nonspeech oral movements

  • Christopher Rorden, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Dr. Christopher Rorden, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208.
  • ,
  • Ben Davis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
  • ,
  • Mark S. George, MD

      Affiliations

    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Borckardt, MD

      Affiliations

    • Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • ,
  • Julius Fridriksson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina

Received 20 May 2008 ,Revised 19 August 2008 ,Accepted 21 August 2008.

References 

  1. Devlin JT, Watkins KE. Stimulating language: insights from TMS. Brain. 2007;130:610–622
  2. Shapiro LP, Gordon B, Hack N, Killackey J. Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. J Brain Lang. 1993;45:423–447
  3. Zurif E, Swinney D, Prather P, Solomon J, Bushell C. An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain Lang. 1993;45:448–464
  4. Watkins K, Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca's area. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16:978–987
  5. Campbell R, MacSweeney M, Surguladze S, et al. Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: an fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts (gurning). Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001;12:233–243
  6. Meister IG, Wilson SM, Deblieck C, Wu AD, Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr Biol. 2007;17:1692–1696
  7. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP, Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev. 1967;74:431–461
  8. Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA. Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:188–194
  9. Borckardt JJ, Walker J, Branham RK, et al. Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system. Brain Stimulation. 2008;1:52–59
  10. Iacoboni M. The role of premotor cortex in speech perception: evidence from fMRI and rTMS. J Physiol Paris. 2008;20:31–34

 Funding for project provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS054266 & R01 DC008255).

PII: S1935-861X(08)00332-X

doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.002

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Pages 383-385 , October 2008