BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 103-107, April 2009

A preliminary study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain

  • Bradford W. Fenton, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Summa Health System Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akron, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Dr Bradford W. Fenton, 75 Arch St, Akron, OH 44304.
  • ,
  • Patrick A. Palmieri, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Summa Health System, Department of Psychiatry, Center for the Treatment and Study of Traumatic Stress, Akron, Ohio
  • ,
  • Paolo Boggio, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • James Fanning, DO

      Affiliations

    • Summa Health System Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akron, Ohio
  • ,
  • Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 7 July 2008; received in revised form 22 September 2008; accepted 22 September 2008. published online 02 March 2009.

Background

The modulatory effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) appear beneficial for different chronic pain syndromes; however, it is unclear whether this method can be used to treat refractory chronic pelvic pain.

Objective

The objective of this preliminary study was to determine the efficacy and safety of tDCS for the management of refractory chronic pelvic pain.

Methods

Seven patients with chronic pelvic pain having failed standard medical or surgical therapy underwent a crossover, double-blind sham controlled tDCS treatment protocol consisting of 1 mA applied for 20 minutes on two consecutive days with 2 weeks of follow-up symptom recording. Symptoms were recorded using multiple scoring systems, including visual analog scales for different pains, as well as organ-specific symptom scales. Comparison between active and sham treatment was performed by using paired t tests.

Results

Overall and pelvic pain scores were significantly lower after active compared with sham treatment, as were disability and traumatic stress scores. No patient discontinued the study because of side effects, which were infrequent.

Conclusions

Active tDCS treatment induces a modest pain reduction in refractory chronic pelvic pain patients as compared with sham tDCS treatment. These results can guide the design and implementation of further studies investigating this method of neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain.

Keywords: tDCS, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, fibromyalgia, noninvasive neurostimulation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1935-861X(08)00341-0

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.009

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 103-107, April 2009