BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 215-228.e3, October 2009

Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro

  • Thomas Radman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Raddy L. Ramos, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroscience, New York College of Osteopathic Medicine NYIT, Old Westbury, New York
    • Department of Psychology, Queens College, CUNY, Flushing, New York
  • ,
  • Joshua C. Brumberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Queens College, CUNY, Flushing, New York
  • ,
  • Marom Bikson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Marom Bikson, PhD, 140th St and Convent Ave, CCNY BME, Steinman Hall Room T-463, New York, NY 10031.

Received 11 November 2008; received in revised form 21 March 2009; accepted 27 March 2009. published online 08 May 2009.

Background

The neocortex is the most common target of subdural electrotherapy and noninvasive brain stimulation modalities, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial current simulation (TCS). Specific neuronal elements targeted by cortical stimulation are considered to underlie therapeutic effects, but the exact cell type(s) affected by these methods remains poorly understood.

Objective

We determined whether neuronal morphology or cell type predicted responses to subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric fields.

Methods

We characterized the effects of subthreshold and suprathreshold electrical stimulation on identified cortical neurons in vitro. Uniform electric fields were applied to rat motor cortex brain slices, while recording from interneurons and pyramidal cells across cortical layers, using a whole-cell patch clamp. Neuron morphology was reconstructed after intracellular dialysis of biocytin. Based solely on volume-weighted morphology, we developed a parsimonious model of neuronal soma polarization by subthreshold electric fields.

Results

We found that neuronal morphology correlated with somatic subthreshold polarization. Based on neuronal morphology, we predict layer V pyramidal neuronal soma to be individually the most sensitive to polarization by optimally oriented subthreshold fields. Suprathreshold electric field action potential threshold was shown to reflect both direct cell polarization and synaptic (network) activation. Layer V/VI neuron absolute electric field action potential thresholds were lower than layer II/III pyramidal neurons and interneurons. Compared with somatic current injection, electric fields promoted burst firing and modulated action potential firing times.

Conclusions

We present experimental data indicating that cortical neuron morphology relative to electric fields and cortical cell type are factors in determining sensitivity to sub- and supra-threshold brain stimulation.

Keywords: transcranial magnetic stimulation, direct current stimulation, cortex, layer, rTMS, motor threshold, functional electrical stimulation, TDCs, clectroconvulsive therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported in part by the NIH NS058758 to J.C.B, NS054783-01A1 S06GMOO8168 to MB, the Andy Grove Foundation, and PSC-CUNY.

PII: S1935-861X(09)00042-4

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 215-228.e3, October 2009