BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 161-169, July 2010

Long-lasting inhibition of cerebellar output

  • T. Popa

      Affiliations

    • ER6 University of Pierre et Marie Curie (University of Paris 06), Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Dr. Traian Popa, ER6 UPMC (Univ Paris 06), Service de Réadaptation Fonctionnelle, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 47 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France.
  • ,
  • M. Russo

      Affiliations

    • ER6 University of Pierre et Marie Curie (University of Paris 06), Paris, France
    • Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatric, and Anestesiologic Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
  • ,
  • S. Meunier

      Affiliations

    • ER6 University of Pierre et Marie Curie (University of Paris 06), Paris, France

Received 19 June 2009; received in revised form 28 September 2009; accepted 6 October 2009. published online 02 November 2009.

Objective

The cerebellar influence on the motor cortex output is exerted mostly though the cerebellothalamocortical pathway (CTC). One way to explore this pathway is by the means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A single-pulse conditioning magnetic stimulation delivered over the lateral cerebellum was shown to diminish the excitability of the contralateral motor cortex 5 milliseconds later (cerebellocortical inhibition [CBI]), most likely through transynaptic activation of cerebellar Purkinje cells, which in turn inhibit the tonic activity of the CTC. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) delivered over the lateral cerebellum was shown to induce a long-lasting change of the cortical excitability, as well, but the mechanism and time course of this effect are still debated.

Methods

We tested the time course of the effects of rTMS on the CBI in five paradigms: (1) 1 Hz rTMS, (2) continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), and (3) intermittent TBS (iTBS) over the right cerebellum, (4) 1 Hz rTMS over the cervical nerve roots, and (5) 1 Hz rTMS over the left cerebellum. Surface electromyography was recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and adductor digiti minimi. A double-cone coil was used for single-pulse cerebellar stimulation, whereas a figure-of-eight coil was used for the rTMS. The stimulus intensity was set at 90% of the M1 resting motor threshold for 1 Hz rTMS, and at 80% of the M1 active motor threshold for TBS. Both types of cerebellar stimulation were performed under magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided neuronavigation centered over the right VIII B lobule, and stimulation intensities were adjusted for cerebellar cortex depth. A figure-of-eight coil was used for left motor cortex stimulation.

Results

There was significant CBI suppression to the left motor cortex up to 30 minutes after the 900 stimuli of 1 Hz rTMS over either cerebellar hemisphere, and after 600 stimuli of cTBS over the right cerebellum, but not after 600 stimuli of iTBS over the right cerebellum, or after 900 of 1 Hz rTMS stimuli delivered over the cervical nerve roots. The 1 Hz rTMS over the left cerebellum significantly reduced the CBI in the right FDI 10 minutes after the end of the intervention. The amplitudes of the unconditioned cortical motor-evoked potentials were not significantly changed.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that repetitive cerebellar stimulation operate at a cerebellar level, rather then at a cortical level.

Keywords: cerebellum, inhibition, motor cortex, repetitive magnetic stimulation, theta burst, human

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a scholarship of the “Pierre et Marie Curie” University, Paris 06, and by a Bourse Santé Mentale Neurologie of the Lilly Institute, France.

PII: S1935-861X(09)00105-3

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.001

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 161-169, July 2010