Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 119-123 (April 2010)


View previous. 9 of 11 View next.

Optically tracked neuronavigation increases the stability of hand-held focal coil positioning: Evidence from “transcranial” magnetic stimulation-induced electrical field measurements

Partial presentation of these data during the Third International Conference on Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation, October 1-4, 2008, Göttingen, Germany.

Massimo CincottaaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Fabio Giovannelliab, Alessandra Borgheresia, Fabrizio Balestrieria, Lucia Toscania, Gaetano Zaccaraa, Filippo Carduccicd, Maria Pia Viggianob, Simone Rossie

Received 26 October 2009; received in revised form 23 December 2009; accepted 3 January 2010. published online 01 February 2010.

The stability of hand-held coil positioning with neuronavigated versus conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is still underinvestigated. Eleven operators naïve for neuronavigation were asked to position and maintain a figure-of-eight-shaped coil over a dipole probe placed within of a polystyrene reproduction of the human head and scalp, in correspondence of the right primary motor cortex. Ten monophasic magnetic pulses were delivered at 46% maximal stimulator output (MSO) in two different experimental conditions: (1) assisted by an optically tracked neuronavigational system; and (2) without neuronavigation. With neuronavigated stimulation, both standard deviation and coefficient of variation of the voltages induced in the dipole probe were significantly lower than without neuronavigation. Results were confirmed in four operators performing a longer-lasting experiment using 50 magnetic pulses in each condition, at an intensity of at 40% MSO. Findings show that optically tracked neuronavigation improves the stability of focal coil positioning.

a Unità Operativa di Neurologia dell'Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

b Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

c Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Università di Roma “Sapienza”, Roma, Italy

d Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, AFaR S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Roma, Italy

e Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Sezione Neurologia, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Massimo Cincotta, U.O. di Neurologia, Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Ospedale Piero Palagi, Viale Michelangiolo, 41, 50125 Firenze, Italia.

 This project was supported by a grant from “Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze,” Florence, Italy.

PII: S1935-861X(10)00002-1

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.01.001


View previous. 9 of 11 View next.

Advertisement