BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Pages 218-225, October 2010

A numerically optimized active shield for improved transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting

  • Luis Hernandez-Garcia

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Functional MRI laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Luis Hernandez-Garcia, PhD, FMRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2108.
  • ,
  • Timothy Hall

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Luis Gomez

      Affiliations

    • Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Eric Michielssen

      Affiliations

    • Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Received 14 January 2010; received in revised form 3 April 2010; accepted 13 May 2010. published online 21 June 2010.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) devices suffer of poor targeting and penetration depth. A new approach to designing TMS coils is introduced in order to improve the focus of the stimulation region through the use of actively shielded probes. Iterative optimization techniques were used to design different active shielding coils for TMS probes. The new approach aims to increase the amount of energy deposited in a thin cylindrical region below the probe relative to the energy deposited elsewhere in the region (“sharpness”), whereas, simultaneously increase the induced electric field deep in the target region relative to the surface (“penetration”). After convergence, the resulting designs showed that there is a clear tradeoff between sharpness and penetration that can be controlled by the choice of a tuning parameter. The resulting designs were tested on a realistic human head conductivity model, taking the contribution from surface charges into account. The design of choice reduced penetration depths by 16.7%. The activated surface area was reduced by 24.1% and the volume of the activation was reduced from 42.6% by the shield. Restoring the lost penetration could be achieved by increasing the total power to the coil by 16.3%, but in that case, the stimulated volume reduction was only 13.1% and there was a slight increase in the stimulated surface area (2.9%).

Keywords: transcranial magnetic stimulation, optimization, active shielding

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health, NINDS (5 R21 NS058691).

PII: S1935-861X(10)00057-4

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.05.001

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Pages 218-225, October 2010