BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Pages 200-206, October 2010

Can a behavioral intervention enhance the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on mood?

  • Kate E. Hoy

      Affiliations

    • Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Victoria, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr. Kate Hoy, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, First Floor, Old Baker Building, The Alfred, Commercial Road Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004.
  • ,
  • Peter G. Enticott

      Affiliations

    • Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Zafiris J. Daskalakis

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Paul B. Fitzgerald

      Affiliations

    • Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Victoria, Australia

Received 26 November 2009; received in revised form 21 April 2010; accepted 7 June 2010. published online 30 June 2010.

Background

One of the few novel treatments developed for major depression in recent years has been repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Despite mostly promising results, 50-60% of patients do not respond to rTMS. Therefore, it is important to investigate ways of enhancing the effectiveness of this treatment. To date, attempting to enhance the mood effects of rTMS via behavioral means has not been investigated. One such intervention involves concurrent exposure to affective stimuli that have been shown to result in activation of brain regions associated with emotion. This pilot study of ten participants investigates such an intervention.

Objectives

The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether exposing participants to affective stimuli while they were receiving 5 Hz rTMS resulted in greater mood change compared with rTMS or affective stimuli alone.

Methods

Ten healthy male and female participants were exposed to affective stimuli while receiving rTMS. All participants took part in three counterbalanced conditions conducted a week apart in which they received rTMS (active or sham) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) combined with affective stimuli (positive or neutral). To measure the impact of the dual intervention visual analogue mood scales and an affective go no go task were conducted pre- and post intervention for each session.

Results

There was no effect of any rTMS condition on performances on the affective go no go task, or on any of the visual analogue scales.

Conclusions

The current data do not provide support for the use of affective stimuli during rTMS. Methodological limitations that may have contributed to the lack of significant findings are discussed.

Keywords: transcranial magnetic stimulation, affective stimuli, mood

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 K. Hoy and P. Enticott were supported by Post Doctoral Training Fellowships from the National Health and Medical Research Council. P. Fitzgerald was supported by a Practitioner Fellowship grant from National Health and Medical Research Council and ZJ. Daskalakis by a NARSAD Young Investigator award.

 P. Fitzgerald and ZJ. Daskalakis have received support for participation in a research study from Neuronetics Ltd and have no relevant conflicts of interest. K. Hoy and P. Enticott have nothing to disclose.

PII: S1935-861X(10)00059-8

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.06.001

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Pages 200-206, October 2010