BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 228-241, October 2011

Polarity of cortical electrical stimulation differentially affects neuronal activity of deep and superficial layers of rat motor cortex

  • Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1101 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
  • ,
  • Daryl R. Kipke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Mark J. Lehmkuhle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Received 1 June 2010; received in revised form 23 November 2010; accepted 30 November 2010. published online 29 December 2010.

Background

Cortical electrical stimulation (CES) techniques are practical tools in neurorehabilitation that are currently being used to test models of functional recovery after neurologic injury. However, the mechanisms by which CES has therapeutic effects, are not fully understood.

Objective

In this study, we investigated the effects of CES on unit activity of different neuronal elements in layers of rat primary motor cortex after the offset of stimulation. We evaluated the effects of monopolar CES pulse polarity (anodic-first versus cathodic-first) using various stimulation frequencies and amplitudes on unit activity after stimulation.

Methods

A penetrating single shank silicon microelectrode array enabled us to span the entirety of six layer motor cortex allowing simultaneous electrophysiologic recordings from different depths after monopolar CES. Neural spiking activity before the onset and after the offset of CES was modeled using point processes fit to capture neural spiking dynamics as a function of extrinsic stimuli based on generalized linear model methods.

Results

We found that neurons in lower layers have a higher probability of being excited after anodic CES. Conversely, neurons located in upper cortical layers have a higher probability of being excited after cathodic stimulation. The opposing effects observed following anodic versus cathodic stimulation in upper and lower layers were frequency- and amplitude-dependent.

Conclusions

The data demonstrates that the poststimulus changes in neural activity after manipulation of CES parameters changes according to the location (depth) of the recorded units in rat primary motor cortex. The most effective pulse polarity for eliciting action potentials after stimulation in lower layers was not as effective in upper layers. Likewise, lower amplitudes and frequencies of CES were more effective than higher amplitudes and frequencies for eliciting action potentials. These results have important implications in the context of maximizing efficacy of CES for neurorehabilitation and neuroprosthetic applications.

Keywords: cortical electrical stimulation, anodic, cathodic, penetrating electrode array, rat primary motor cortex

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported in part by grants from Northstar Neuroscience, Inc. (all authors), NIBIB P41 EB002030 (A.Y. and D.R.K.), and NIDCD F32 DC7797 (M.J.L.).

 D.R.K. has a financial interest in NeuroNexus Technologies.

PII: S1935-861X(10)00168-3

doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.004

BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 228-241, October 2011