Advertisement

Conditioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Evidence of sensory-induced responding and prepulse inhibition

Published:September 18, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.08.003

      Background

      Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method for stimulating the human cortex. Classical conditioning is a phenomenon of developed associations between stimuli. Our primary objective was to determine whether TMS effects could be conditioned. Prepulse inhibition represents another relationship between two stimuli, and a secondary assessment was performed to explore this relationship.

      Methods

      An auditory-visual conditioning stimulus (CS) was paired with the TMS unconditioned stimulus (US) over motor cortex producing a motor-evoked potential (MEP) unconditioned response (UR). Two versions of the CS-US pairing paradigms were tested, one with a short intertrial interval (ITI) and another with a long ITI. The short ITI paradigm had more CS-US pairings and shorter session duration than the long ITI paradigm. Tests for conditioned responses (CRs) were performed following CS-US pairing (CS+/US+), by presenting the CS alone (CS+/US−). Reverse testing was also performed after CS-US pairing (CS+/US+) in separate sessions, by presenting the US alone (CS−/US+).

      Results

      Evidence for CRs was found only with the short ITI paradigm. The magnitudes of CRs were smaller than TMS-induced MEPs, and the CRs were found only in a percentage of tests. Prepulse inhibition was robustly evident for the long ITI paradigm, but not for the short ITI paradigm.

      Conclusions

      We have found evidence that classical conditioning principles can be applied to brain stimulation in humans. These findings provide a method for exploring brain and behavioral relationships in humans, as well as suggesting approaches to enhance therapeutic uses of TMS or other forms of brain stimulation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Terao Y.
        • Ugawa Y.
        Basic mechanisms of TMS.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 19: 322-343
        • Anand S.
        • Hotson J.
        Transcranial magnetic stimulation: neurophysiological applications and safety.
        Brain Cogn. 2002; 50: 366-386
        • Sohn Y.H.
        • Hallett M.
        Motor evoked potentials.
        Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004; 15 (vii): 117-131
        • Chen R.
        Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
        Muscle Nerve Suppl. 2000; 9: S26-S32
        • Ray P.G.
        • Meador K.J.
        • Epstein C.M.
        • Loring D.W.
        • Day L.J.
        Magnetic stimulation of visual cortex: factors influencing the perception of phosphenes.
        J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 15: 351-357
        • Cowey A.
        • Walsh V.
        Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers.
        Neuroreport. 2000; 11: 3269-3273
        • Epstein C.M.
        • Lah J.J.
        • Meador K.
        • Weissman J.D.
        • Gaitan L.E.
        • Dihenia B.
        Optimum stimulus parameters for lateralized suppression of speech with magnetic brain stimulation.
        Neurology. 1996; 47: 1590-1593
        • Gershon A.A.
        • Dannon P.N.
        • Grunhaus L.
        Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160: 835-845
        • O'Reardon J.P.
        • Solvason H.B.
        • Janicak P.G.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2007; 62: 1208-1216
        • Arana A.B.
        • Borckardt J.J.
        • Ricci R.
        • et al.
        Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?.
        Brain Stimulation. 2008; 1: 44-51
        • Borckardt J.J.
        • Walker J.
        • Branham R.K.
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of a portable sham TMS system.
        Brain Stimulation. 2008; 1: 52-59
        • Aguado L.
        Neuroscience of Pavlovian conditioning: a brief review.
        Span J Psychol. 2003; 6: 155-167
        • Logan C.A.
        When scientific knowledge becomes scientific discovery: the disappearance of classical conditioning before Pavlov.
        J Hist Behav Sci. 2002; 38: 393-403
        • Carter R.M.
        • Hofstotter C.
        • Tsuchiya N.
        • Koch C.
        Working memory and fear conditioning.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 1399-1404
        • McLaughlin J.
        • Skaggs H.
        • Churchwell J.
        • Powell D.A.
        Medial prefrontal cortex and pavlovian conditioning: trace versus delay conditioning.
        Behav Neurosci. 2002; 116: 37-47
        • Wasserman E.A.
        • Miller R.R.
        What's elementary about associative learning?.
        Annu Rev Psychol. 1997; 48: 573-607
        • Kremer E.F.
        The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.
        J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1978; 4: 22-36
        • Ivkovich D.
        • Stanton M.E.
        Effects of early hippocampal lesions on trace, delay, and long-delay eyeblink conditioning in developing rats.
        Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001; 76: 426-446
        • Carew T.J.
        • Walters E.T.
        • Kandel E.R.
        Classical conditioning in a simple withdrawal reflex in Aplysia californica.
        J Neurosci. 1981; 1: 1426-1437
        • Gorn G.J.
        The effects of music in adverstising on choice behavior: a classical conditioning approach.
        J Marketing. 1982; 46: 94-101
        • Kellaris J.J.
        • Cox A.D.
        The effects of background music in advertising: a reassessment.
        J Consumer Res. 1989; 16: 113-118
        • Domjan M.
        Pavlovian conditioning: a functional perspective.
        Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 56: 179-206
        • Wolters A.
        • Sandbrink F.
        • Schlottmann A.
        • et al.
        A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.
        J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89: 2339-2345
        • Stefan K.
        • Kunesch E.
        • Cohen L.G.
        • Benecke R.
        • Classen J.
        Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation.
        Brain. 2000; 3 (123 Pt): 572-584
        • Braff D.L.
        • Geyer M.A.
        • Swerdlow N.R.
        Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies.
        Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 156: 234-258
        • Chen R.
        • Tam A.
        • Butefisch C.
        • et al.
        Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex.
        J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80: 2870-2881
        • Furubayashi T.
        • Ugawa Y.
        • Terao Y.
        • et al.
        The human hand motor area is transiently suppressed by an unexpected auditory stimulus.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111: 178-183
        • Luber B.
        • Balsam P.
        • Nguyen T.
        • Gross M.
        • Lisanby S.H.
        Classical conditioned learning using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
        Exp Brain Res. 2007; 183: 361-369
        • Mishory A.
        • Molnar C.
        • Koola J.
        • et al.
        The maximum-likelihood strategy for determining transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold, using parameter estimation by sequential testing is faster than conventional methods with similar precision.
        J ECT. 2004; 20: 160-165
        • Aou S.
        • Woody C.D.
        • Birt D.
        Increases in excitability of neurons of the motor cortex of cats after rapid acquisition of eye blink conditioning.
        J Neurosci. 1992; 12: 560-569
        • Aou S.
        • Woody C.D.
        • Birt D.
        Changes in the activity of units of the cat motor cortex with rapid conditioning and extinction of a compound eye blink movement.
        J Neurosci. 1992; 12: 549-559
        • Birt D.
        • Aou S.
        • Woody C.D.
        Intracellularly recorded responses of neurons of the motor cortex of awake cats to presentations of Pavlovian conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.
        Brain Res. 2003; 969: 205-216
        • Mottaghy F.M.
        • Gangitano M.
        • Krause B.J.
        • Pascual-Leone A.
        Chronometry of parietal and prefrontal activations in verbal working memory revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
        Neuroimage. 2003; 18: 565-575
        • Pourtois G.
        • Vandermeeren Y.
        • Olivier E.
        • de Gelder B.
        Event-related TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex induces ipsilateral visuo-spatial interference.
        Neuroreport. 2001; 12: 2369-2374
        • Bohning D.E.
        • He L.
        • George M.S.
        • Epstein C.M.
        Deconvolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) maps.
        J Neural Transm. 2001; 108: 35-52
        • Hernandez-Garcia L.
        • Lee S.
        • Grissom W.
        An approach to MRI-based dosimetry for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
        Neuroimage. 2007; 36: 1171-1178
        • Murphy G.G.
        • Glanzman D.L.
        Cellular analog of differential classical conditioning in Aplysia: disruption by the NMDA receptor antagonist DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate.
        J Neurosci. 1999; 19: 10595-10602
        • Burt T.
        • Lisanby S.H.
        • Sackeim H.A.
        Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis.
        Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002; 5: 73-103