Advertisement

Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study

Published:October 16, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010

      Abstract

      Background

      Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces long-lasting NMDA receptor-dependent cortical plasticity via persistent subthreshold polarization of neuronal membranes. Conventional bipolar tDCS is applied with two large (35 cm2) rectangular electrodes, resulting in directional modulation of neuronal excitability. Recently a newly designed 4 × 1 high-definition (HD) tDCS protocol was proposed for more focal stimulation according to the results of computational modeling. HD tDCS utilizes small disc electrodes deployed in 4 × 1 ring configuration whereby the physiological effects of the induced electric field are thought to be grossly constrained to the cortical area circumscribed by the ring.

      Objective

      We aim to compare the physiological effects of both tDCS electrode arrangements on motor cortex excitability.

      Methods

      tDCS was applied with 2 mA for 10 min. Fourteen healthy subjects participated, and motor cortex excitability was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after tDCS.

      Results

      Excitability enhancement following anodal and a respective reduction after cathodal stimulation occurred in both, conventional and HD tDCS. However, the plastic changes showed a more delayed peak at 30 min and longer lasting after-effects for more than 2 h after HD tDCS for both polarities, as compared to conventional tDCS.

      Conclusion

      The results show that this new electrode arrangement is efficient for the induction of neuroplasticity in the primary motor cortex. The pattern of aftereffects might be compatible with the concept of GABA-mediated surround inhibition, which should be explored in future studies directly.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Nitsche M.
        • Nitsche M.
        • Klein C.
        • Tergau F.
        • Rothwell J.
        • Paulus W.
        Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114: 600-604
        • Nitsche M.
        • Paulus W.
        Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.
        J Physiol. 2000; 527: 633-639
        • Nitsche M.
        • Paulus W.
        Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.
        Neurology. 2001; 57: 1899-1901
        • Nitsche M.A.
        • Cohen L.G.
        • Wassermann E.M.
        • Priori A.
        • Lang N.
        • Antal A.
        • et al.
        Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008..
        Brain Stimul. 2008; 1: 206-223
        • Webster B.R.
        • Celnik P.A.
        • Cohen L.G.
        Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental..
        NeuroTherapeutics. 2006; 3: 474-481
        • Fregni F.
        • Freedman S.
        • Pascual-Leone A.
        Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques.
        Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6: 188-191
        • Lang N.
        • Siebner H.
        • Ward N.
        • Lee L.
        • Nitsche M.
        • Paulus W.
        • et al.
        How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain?.
        Eur J Neurosci. 2005; 22: 495-504
        • Datta A.
        • Bansal V.
        • Diaz J.
        • Patel J.
        • Reato D.
        • Bikson M.
        Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.
        Brain Stimul. 2009; 2 (207.e1): 201-207
        • Faria P.
        • Hallett M.
        • Miranda P.C.
        A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS.
        J Neural Eng. 2011; 8: 066017
        • Nitsche M.A.
        • Doemkes S.
        • Karakose T.
        • Antal A.
        • Liebetanz D.
        • Lang N.
        • et al.
        Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.
        J Neurophysiol. 2007; 97: 3109-3117
        • Minhas P.
        • Bansal V.
        • Patel J.
        • Ho J.S.
        • Diaz J.
        • Datta A.
        • et al.
        Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS..
        J Neurosci Methods. 2010; 190: 188-197
        • Datta A.
        • Elwassif M.
        • Battaglia F.
        • Bikson M.
        Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.
        J Neural Eng. 2008; 5: 163-174
        • Rothwell J.C.
        Evoked potentials, magnetic stimulation studies, and event-related potentials.
        Curr Opin Neurol. 1993; 6: 715-723
        • Borckardt J.J.
        • Bikson M.
        • Frohman H.
        • Reeves S.T.
        • Datta A.
        • Bansal V.
        • et al.
        A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception.
        J Pain. 2012; 13: 112-120
        • Bachmann C.G.
        • Muschinsky S.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        • Rolke R.
        • Magerl W.
        • Treede R.D.
        • et al.
        Transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex induces distinct changes in thermal and mechanical sensory percepts.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 121: 2083-2089
        • Boggio P.S.
        • Zaghi S.
        • Lopes M.
        • Fregni F.
        Modulatory effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on perception and pain thresholds in healthy volunteers.
        Eur J Neurol. 2008; 15: 1124-1130
        • Radman T.
        • Ramos R.L.
        • Brumberg J.C.
        • Bikson M.
        Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro.
        Brain Stimul. 2009; 2 (228.e1–3): 215-228
        • Beck S.
        • Hallett M.
        Surround inhibition in the motor system.
        Exp Brain Res. 2011; 210: 165-172
        • Nitsche M.
        • Liebetanz D.
        • Schlitterlau A.
        • Henschke U.
        • Fricke K.
        • Frommann K.
        • et al.
        GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans.
        Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19: 2720-2726