Advertisement
Other Original Article| Volume 7, ISSUE 6, P878-889, November 2014

Download started.

Ok

Endogenous Cortical Oscillations Constrain Neuromodulation by Weak Electric Fields

  • Stephen L. Schmidt
    Affiliations
    Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Apoorva K. Iyengar
    Affiliations
    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • A. Alban Foulser
    Affiliations
    Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michael R. Boyle
    Affiliations
    Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Flavio Fröhlich
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. 115 Mason Farm Rd. NRB 4109F, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Neurobiology Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Endogenous oscillations constrain neuromodulation by weak electric fields.
      • Weak electric fields enhance neocortical oscillations by resonance.
      • Frequency-matched tACS is likely most effective for enhancement of cortical rhythms.

      Abstract

      Background

      Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation modality that may modulate cognition by enhancing endogenous neocortical oscillations by application of sine-wave electric fields. Yet, the role of endogenous network activity in enabling and shaping the effects of tACS has remained unclear.

      Objective

      We combined optogenetic stimulation and multichannel slice electrophysiology to elucidate how the effect of a weak sine-wave electric field depends on the ongoing cortical oscillatory activity. We hypothesized that endogenous cortical oscillations constrain neuromodulation by tACS.

      Methods

      We studied the effect of weak sine-wave electric fields on oscillatory activity in mouse neocortical slices. Optogenetic control of the network activity enabled the generation of in vivo-like cortical oscillations for studying the temporal relationship between network activity and sine-wave electric field stimulation.

      Results

      Weak electric fields enhanced endogenous oscillations but failed to induce a frequency shift of the ongoing oscillation for stimulation frequencies that were not matched to the endogenous oscillation. This constraint on the effect of electric field stimulation imposed by endogenous network dynamics was limited to the case of weak electric fields targeting in vivo-like network dynamics. Together, these results suggest that the key mechanism of tACS may be enhancing, but not overriding, intrinsic network dynamics.

      Conclusion

      Our results contribute to understanding the inconsistent tACS results from human studies and propose that stimulation precisely adjusted in frequency to the endogenous oscillations is key to rational design of non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Buzsáki G.
        Rhythms of the brain.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York2006
        • Wang X.J.
        Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition.
        Physiol Rev. 2010 Jul; 90 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review]): 1195-1268
        • Uhlhaas P.J.
        • Singer W.
        Neuronal dynamics and neuropsychiatric disorders: toward a translational paradigm for dysfunctional large-scale networks.
        Neuron. 2012 Sep 20; 75 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review]): 963-980
        • Romei V.
        • Gross J.
        • Thut G.
        On the role of prestimulus alpha rhythms over occipito-parietal areas in visual input regulation: correlation or causation?.
        J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23; 30: 8692-8697
        • Sauseng P.
        • Klimesch W.
        • Heise K.F.
        • et al.
        Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity.
        Curr Biol. 2009 Nov 17; 19 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 1846-1852
        • Thut G.
        • Veniero D.
        • Romei V.
        • Miniussi C.
        • Schyns P.
        • Gross J.
        Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures.
        Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26; 21 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 1176-1185
        • Herrmann C.S.
        • Rach S.
        • Neuling T.
        • Struber D.
        Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7: 279
        • Polania R.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        • Korman C.
        • Batsikadze G.
        • Paulus W.
        The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance.
        Curr Biol. 2012 Jul 24; 22 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 1314-1318
        • Santarnecchi E.
        • Polizzotto N.R.
        • Godone M.
        • et al.
        Frequency-dependent enhancement of fluid intelligence induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials.
        Curr Biol. 2013 Aug 5; 23: 1449-1453
        • Kirov R.
        • Weiss C.
        • Siebner H.R.
        • Born J.
        • Marshall L.
        Slow oscillation electrical brain stimulation during waking promotes EEG theta activity and memory encoding.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8; 106 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 15460-15465
        • Marshall L.
        • Helgadottir H.
        • Molle M.
        • Born J.
        Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory.
        Nature. 2006 Nov 30; 444 ([Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 610-613
        • Binder S.
        • Rawohl J.
        • Born J.
        • Marshall L.
        Transcranial slow oscillation stimulation during NREM sleep enhances acquisition of the radial maze task and modulates cortical network activity in rats.
        Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 7: 220
        • Deans J.K.
        • Powell A.D.
        • Jefferys J.G.
        Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields.
        J Physiol. 2007 Sep 1; 583 ([In Vitro Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 555-565
        • Frohlich F.
        • McCormick D.A.
        Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity.
        Neuron. 2010 Jul 15; 67 ([In Vitro Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 129-143
        • Reato D.
        • Rahman A.
        • Bikson M.
        • Parra L.C.
        Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing.
        J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10; 30 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]): 15067-15079
        • Ozen S.
        • Sirota A.
        • Belluscio M.A.
        • et al.
        Transcranial electric stimulation entrains cortical neuronal populations in rats.
        J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 25; 30 ([Comparative Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.]): 11476-11485
        • Ali M.M.
        • Sellers K.K.
        • Frohlich F.
        Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates large-scale cortical network activity by network resonance.
        J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 3; 33: 11262-11275
        • Neuling T.
        • Rach S.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7: 161
        • Hutcheon B.
        • Yarom Y.
        Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons.
        Trends Neurosci. 2000 May; 23 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review]): 216-222
        • Beltramo R.
        • D'Urso G.
        • Dal Maschio M.
        • et al.
        Layer-specific excitatory circuits differentially control recurrent network dynamics in the neocortex.
        Nat Neurosci. 2013 Feb; 16 ([In Vitro Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 227-234
        • Arenkiel B.R.
        • Peca J.
        • Davison I.G.
        • et al.
        In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2.
        Neuron. 2007 Apr 19; 54 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 205-218
        • Chauvette S.
        • Volgushev M.
        • Timofeev I.
        Origin of active states in local neocortical networks during slow sleep oscillation.
        Cereb Cortex. 2010 Nov; 20 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 2660-2674
        • Schmidt S.L.
        • Chew E.Y.
        • Bennett D.V.
        • Hammad M.A.
        • Frohlich F.
        Differential effects of cholinergic and noradrenergic neuromodulation on spontaneous cortical network dynamics.
        Neuropharmacology. 2013 May 3; 72C: 259-273
        • Sanchez-Vives M.V.
        • McCormick D.A.
        Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex.
        Nat Neurosci. 2000 Oct; 3 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.]): 1027-1034
        • Tranchina D.
        • Nicholson C.
        A model for the polarization of neurons by extrinsically applied electric fields.
        Biophys J. 1986 Dec; 50 ([Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.]): 1139-1156
        • Bikson M.
        • Inoue M.
        • Akiyama H.
        • et al.
        Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro.
        J Physiol. 2004 May 15; 557 ([In Vitro Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 175-190
        • Datta A.
        • Bansal V.
        • Diaz J.
        • Patel J.
        • Reato D.
        • Bikson M.
        Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.
        Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct; 2 ([Evaluation Studies Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 201-207.e1
        • Fee M.S.
        • Mitra P.P.
        • Kleinfeld D.
        Automatic sorting of multiple unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-Gaussian variability.
        J Neurosci Methods. 1996 Nov; 69: 175-188
        • Hill D.N.
        • Mehta S.B.
        • Kleinfeld D.
        Quality metrics to accompany spike sorting of extracellular signals.
        J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15; 31 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 8699-8705
        • Brunoni A.R.
        • Shiozawa P.
        • Truong D.
        • et al.
        Understanding tDCS effects in schizophrenia: a systematic review of clinical data and an integrated computation modeling analysis.
        Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014 Jul; 11: 383-394
        • Reato D.
        • Rahman A.
        • Bikson M.
        • Parra L.C.
        Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity-a review of known mechanisms from animal studies.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7 ([Review]): 687
        • Kuo M.F.
        • Paulus W.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases.
        Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15; 85 Pt 3 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 948-960
        • Radman T.
        • Ramos R.L.
        • Brumberg J.C.
        • Bikson M.
        Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro.
        Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct; 2 (28 e1–3 [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 215-228
        • Feurra M.
        • Pasqualetti P.
        • Bianco G.
        • Santarnecchi E.
        • Rossi A.
        • Rossi S.
        State-dependent effects of transcranial oscillatory currents on the motor system: what you think matters.
        J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 30; 33 ([Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 17483-17489
        • Niell C.M.
        • Stryker M.P.
        Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex.
        Neuron. 2010 Feb 25; 65 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 472-479
        • Curto C.
        • Sakata S.
        • Marguet S.
        • Itskov V.
        • Harris K.D.
        A simple model of cortical dynamics explains variability and state dependence of sensory responses in urethane-anesthetized auditory cortex.
        J Neurosci. 2009 Aug 26; 29 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 10600-10612
        • Neuling T.
        • Wagner S.
        • Wolters C.H.
        • Zaehle T.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        Finite-element model predicts current density distribution for clinical applications of tDCS and tACS.
        Front Psychiatry. 2012; 3: 83
        • Cardin J.A.
        • Carlen M.
        • Meletis K.
        • et al.
        Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses.
        Nature. 2009 Jun 4; 459 ([Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.]): 663-667
        • Frohlich F.
        • Schmidt S.L.
        Rational design of transcranial current stimulation (TCS) through mechanistic insights into cortical network dynamics.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7 ([Review]): 804
        • Kuo H.I.
        • Bikson M.
        • Datta A.
        • et al.
        Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 x 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study.
        Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul; 6: 644-648
        • Struber D.
        • Rach S.
        • Trautmann-Lengsfeld S.A.
        • Engel A.K.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        Antiphasic 40 Hz oscillatory current stimulation affects bistable motion perception.
        Brain Topogr. 2014 Jan; 27 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 158-171
        • Kutchko K.M.
        • Frohlich F.
        Emergence of metastable state dynamics in interconnected cortical networks with propagation delays.
        PLoS Comput Biol. 2013 Oct; 9 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): e1003304
        • Boyle M.R.
        • Frohlich F.
        EEG feedback-controlled transcranial alternating current stimulation.
        I IEEE Embs C Neur E. 2013; : 140-143
        • Helfrich R.F.
        • Schneider T.R.
        • Rach S.
        • Trautmann-Lengsfeld S.A.
        • Engel A.K.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation.
        Curr Biol. 2014 Feb 3; 24 ([Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]): 333-339