Advertisement

Parametric effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on multitasking performance

  • Wan-Yu Hsu
    Affiliations
    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Department of Neuroscape, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Theodore P. Zanto
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. University of California, San Francisco. Sandler Neuroscience Center, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Room 502, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Department of Neuroscape, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Adam Gazzaley
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. University of California, San Francisco. Sandler Neuroscience Center, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Room 511C, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Departments of Physiology and Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Department of Neuroscape, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 23, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.010

      Highlights

      • Bilateral prefrontal theta-tACS improves multitasking performance.
      • The improvements are coupled with changes across multiple oscillatory frequencies.
      • tACS effects on multitasking performance are not necessarily phase-dependent.
      • Changing the ISI of the stimulation protocol eliminated positive tACS effects.
      • Stimulation protocol is important for generating positive tACS effects.

      Abstract

      Background

      We have previously demonstrated that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can generate positive effects on multitasking performance and associated neurophysiological measures when it is applied with anti-phase theta band stimulation across bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and a short (1-min) inter-session interval (ISI). However, it is unclear how altering the phase of stimulation and the duration of the ISI might impact positive tACS effects. Here, we investigated the role of tACS parameters in engendering performance improvements by manipulating these two stimulation parameters (i.e. phase and ISI) in two experiments.

      Methods

      Repetitive sessions of bilateral PFC theta-tACS were applied with in-phase stimulation + 1-min ISI (experiment 1) and anti-phase stimulation + 5-min ISI (experiment 2) while participants were engaged in a multitasking challenge accompanied by electroencephalography (EEG) data collection.

      Results

      Compared to the control group, in-phase stimulation + 1-min ISI showed an enhancement of multitasking performance coupled with a modulation of posterior alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (13–30 Hz) activities. However, repetitive sessions of anti-phase tACS + 5-min ISI did not generate significant enhancement in multitasking performance, nor changes in neural oscillatory activities compared to the control group.

      Conclusion

      The results revealed that the previous reported positive tACS effects on multitasking performance are not affected by manipulating the phase of current polarity. Yet, changing the ISI of the stimulation protocol eliminated the previous observed performance improvements. Taken together, these results stress the importance of stimulation protocol for generating positive tACS effects on cognitive function and neural oscillations.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Schroeder C.E.
        • Lakatos P.
        Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection.
        Trends Neurosci. 2009; 32: 9-18
        • Pogosyan A.
        • Gaynor L.D.
        • Eusebio A.
        • Brown P.
        Boosting cortical activity at Beta-band frequencies slows movement in humans.
        Curr Biol. 2009; 19: 1637-1641
        • Buzsaki G.
        • Wang X.J.
        Mechanisms of gamma oscillations.
        Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 203-225
        • Basar E.
        • Basar-Eroglu C.
        • Karakas S.
        • Schurmann M.
        Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes.
        Int J Psychophysiol. 2001; 39: 241-248
        • Engel A.K.
        • Fries P.
        • Singer W.
        Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing.
        Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2: 704-716
        • Herrmann C.S.
        • Munk M.H.
        • Engel A.K.
        Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: memory match and utilization.
        Trends Cognit Sci. 2004; 8: 347-355
        • Klimesch W.
        alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information.
        Trends Cognit Sci. 2012; 16: 606-617
        • Raghavachari S.
        • Lisman J.E.
        • Tully M.
        • Madsen J.R.
        • Bromfield E.B.
        • Kahana M.J.
        Theta oscillations in human cortex during a working-memory task: evidence for local generators.
        J Neurophysiol. 2006; 95: 1630-1638
        • Sauseng P.
        • Griesmayr B.
        • Freunberger R.
        • Klimesch W.
        Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations.
        Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34: 1015-1022
        • Sela T.
        • Kilim A.
        • Lavidor M.
        Transcranial alternating current stimulation increases risk-taking behavior in the balloon analog risk task.
        Front Neurosci. 2012; 6: 22
        • Meiron O.
        • Lavidor M.
        Prefrontal oscillatory stimulation modulates access to cognitive control references in retrospective metacognitive commentary.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125: 77-82
        • Ishii R.
        • Shinosaki K.
        • Ukai S.
        • Inouye T.
        • Ishihara T.
        • Yoshimine T.
        • et al.
        Medial prefrontal cortex generates frontal midline theta rhythm.
        Neuroreport. 1999; 10: 675-679
        • Anguera J.A.
        • Boccanfuso J.
        • Rintoul J.L.
        • Al-Hashimi O.
        • Faraji F.
        • Janowich J.
        • et al.
        Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults.
        Nature. 2013; 501: 97-101
        • Kuo M.F.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition.
        Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012; 43: 192-199
        • Thut G.
        • Miniussi C.
        New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS-EEG studies.
        Trends Cognit Sci. 2009; 13: 182-189
        • Thut G.
        • Veniero D.
        • Romei V.
        • Miniussi C.
        • Schyns P.
        • Gross J.
        Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures.
        Curr Biol. 2011; 21: 1176-1185
        • Feurra M.
        • Paulus W.
        • Walsh V.
        • Kanai R.
        Frequency specific modulation of human somatosensory cortex.
        Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 13
        • Kanai R.
        • Chaieb L.
        • Antal A.
        • Walsh V.
        • Paulus W.
        Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex.
        Curr Biol. 2008; 18: 1839-1843
        • Neuling T.
        • Rach S.
        • Wagner S.
        • Wolters C.H.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        Good vibrations: oscillatory phase shapes perception.
        Neuroimage. 2012; 63: 771-778
        • Brittain J.S.
        • Probert-Smith P.
        • Aziz T.Z.
        • Brown P.
        Tremor suppression by rhythmic transcranial current stimulation.
        Curr Biol. 2013; 23: 436-440
        • Feurra M.
        • Pasqualetti P.
        • Bianco G.
        • Santarnecchi E.
        • Rossi A.
        • Rossi S.
        State-dependent effects of transcranial oscillatory currents on the motor system: what you think matters.
        J Neurosci. 2013; 33: 17483-17489
        • Joundi R.A.
        • Jenkinson N.
        • Brittain J.S.
        • Aziz T.Z.
        • Brown P.
        Driving oscillatory activity in the human cortex enhances motor performance.
        Curr Biol. 2012; 22: 403-407
        • Santarnecchi E.
        • Polizzotto N.R.
        • Godone M.
        • Giovannelli F.
        • Feurra M.
        • Matzen L.
        • et al.
        Frequency-dependent enhancement of fluid intelligence induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials.
        Curr Biol. 2013; 23: 1449-1453
        • Voss U.
        • Holzmann R.
        • Hobson A.
        • Paulus W.
        • Koppehele-Gossel J.
        • Klimke A.
        • et al.
        Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity.
        Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17: 810-812
        • Hsu W.Y.
        • Zanto T.P.
        • van Schouwenburg M.R.
        • Gazzaley A.
        Enhancement of multitasking performance and neural oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation.
        PloS One. 2017; 12e0178579
        • Feurra M.
        • Bianco G.
        • Santarnecchi E.
        • Del Testa M.
        • Rossi A.
        • Rossi S.
        Frequency-dependent tuning of the human motor system induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials.
        J Neurosci. 2011; 31: 12165-12170
        • Schutter D.J.
        • Wischnewski M.
        A meta-analytic study of exogenous oscillatory electric potentials in neuroenhancement.
        Neuropsychologia. 2016; 86: 110-118
        • Helfrich R.F.
        • Schneider T.R.
        • Rach S.
        • Trautmann-Lengsfeld S.A.
        • Engel A.K.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation.
        Curr Biol. 2014; 24: 333-339
        • Nakazono H.
        • Ogata K.
        • Kuroda T.
        • Tobimatsu S.
        Phase and frequency-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
        PloS One. 2016; 11e0162521
        • Polania R.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        • Korman C.
        • Batsikadze G.
        • Paulus W.
        The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance.
        Curr Biol. 2012; 22: 1314-1318
        • Riecke L.
        • Formisano E.
        • Herrmann C.S.
        • Sack A.T.
        4-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation phase modulates hearing.
        Brain Stimul. 2015; 8: 777-783
        • Monte-Silva K.
        • Kuo M.F.
        • Hessenthaler S.
        • Fresnoza S.
        • Liebetanz D.
        • Paulus W.
        • et al.
        Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.
        Brain Stimul. 2013; 6: 424-432
        • Monte-Silva K.
        • Kuo M.F.
        • Liebetanz D.
        • Paulus W.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
        J Neurophysiol. 2010; 103: 1735-1740
        • Bastani A.
        • Jaberzadeh S.
        Within-session repeated a-tDCS: the effects of repetition rate and inter-stimulus interval on corticospinal excitability and motor performance.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125: 1809-1818
        • Fricke K.
        • Seeber A.A.
        • Thirugnanasambandam N.
        • Paulus W.
        • Nitsche M.A.
        • Rothwell J.C.
        Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.
        J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105: 1141-1149
        • Hsu W.Y.
        • Ku Y.
        • Zanto T.P.
        • Gazzaley A.
        Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neurobiol Aging. 2015; 36: 2348-2359
        • Hsieh L.T.
        • Ranganath C.
        Frontal midline theta oscillations during working memory maintenance and episodic encoding and retrieval.
        Neuroimage. 2014; 85: 721-729
        • Lohse K.
        • Shirzad N.
        • Verster A.
        • Hodges N.
        • Van der Loos H.F.
        Video games and rehabilitation: using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013; 37: 166-175
        • Macmillan N.A.
        • Creelman C.D.
        Detection theory: a user's guide.
        Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey2005
        • Oostenveld R.
        • Fries P.
        • Maris E.
        • Schoffelen J.M.
        FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.
        Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011: 156869
        • Cohen J.
        A power primer.
        Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159
        • Datta A.
        • Elwassif M.
        • Battaglia F.
        • Bikson M.
        Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.
        J Neural Eng. 2008; 5: 163-174
        • Saypol J.M.
        • Roth B.J.
        • Cohen L.G.
        • Hallett M.
        A theoretical comparison of electric and magnetic stimulation of the brain.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 1991; 19: 317-328
        • Fell J.
        • Axmacher N.
        The role of phase synchronization in memory processes.
        Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12: 105-118
        • Vicente R.
        • Gollo L.L.
        • Mirasso C.R.
        • Fischer I.
        • Pipa G.
        Dynamical relaying can yield zero time lag neuronal synchrony despite long conduction delays.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 17157-17162
        • Fries P.
        A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.
        Trends Cognit Sci. 2005; 9: 474-480
        • Palva J.M.
        • Monto S.
        • Kulashekhar S.
        • Palva S.
        Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107: 7580-7585
        • Tseng P.
        • Chang Y.T.
        • Chang C.F.
        • Liang W.K.
        • Juan C.H.
        The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory.
        Sci Rep. 2016; 632138
        • Faria P.
        • Hallett M.
        • Miranda P.C.
        A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS.
        J Neural Eng. 2011; 8066017
        • Basile L.F.
        • Anghinah R.
        • Ribeiro P.
        • Ramos R.T.
        • Piedade R.
        • Ballester G.
        • et al.
        Interindividual variability in EEG correlates of attention and limits of functional mapping.
        Int J Psychophysiol. 2007; 65: 238-251
        • Kaminski J.
        • Brzezicka A.
        • Gola M.
        • Wrobel A.
        Beta band oscillations engagement in human alertness process.
        Int J Psychophysiol. 2012; 85: 125-128
        • Klimesch W.
        • Sauseng P.
        • Hanslmayr S.
        EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis.
        Brain Res Rev. 2007; 53: 63-88
        • Engel A.K.
        • Fries P.
        Beta-band oscillations--signalling the status quo?.
        Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010; 20: 156-165
        • Hotermans C.
        • Peigneux P.
        • Maertens de Noordhout A.
        • Moonen G.
        • Maquet P.
        Early boost and slow consolidation in motor skill learning.
        Learn Mem. 2006; 13: 580-583
        • Wang Z.
        • Zhou R.
        • Shah P.
        Spaced cognitive training promotes training transfer.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 217