x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Multimedia Library
- Motor cortexRemove Motor cortex filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2012 and 2019.
Author
- Rothwell, John C3
- Hamada, Masashi2
- Hays, Seth A2
- Hirata, Akimasa2
- Hulsey, Daniel R2
- Kilgard, Michael P2
- Laakso, Ilkka2
- Rennaker, Robert L II2
- Aberra, Aman S1
- Adcock, Katherine S1
- Bai, Ya-Mei1
- Bestmann, S1
- Boychuk, Jeffery A1
- Brown, Andrew R1
- Cash, RFH1
- Chen, Mu-Hong1
- Chen, R1
- Darvishi, Sam1
- Das, Priyanka1
- Delvendahl, Igor1
- Dupont-Hadwen, J1
- Ehsani, Fatemeh1
- Fox, Peter T1
- Franklin, Crystal1
- Fresnoza, Shane1
Keyword
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation7
- Plasticity6
- TMS4
- APB3
- MEP3
- Motor training3
- Cortical reorganization2
- GABA2
- I-waves2
- Motor evoked potential2
- Short-interval intracortical facilitation2
- 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression1
- 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-II1
- Acetylcholine1
- ADM1
- Anterior-posterior stability index1
- Antidepressant response prediction1
- AP1
- APSI1
- AUC1
- Auditory cortex1
- Balance1
- BBS1
- BDI-II1
Multimedia Library
19 Results
- Research ArticleOpen Access
Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 13Issue 1p175–189Published online: October 7, 2019- Aman S. Aberra
- Boshuo Wang
- Warren M. Grill
- Angel V. Peterchev
Cited in Scopus: 101Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) enables non-invasive modulation of brain activity with both clinical and research applications, but fundamental questions remain about the neural types and elements TMS activates and how stimulation parameters affect the neural response. - Research ArticleOpen Access
Direction of TDCS current flow in human sensorimotor cortex influences behavioural learning
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 12Issue 3p684–692Published online: January 28, 2019- Ricci Hannah
- Anna Iacovou
- John C. Rothwell
Cited in Scopus: 22Recent studies have shown that neurophysiological outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) are influenced by current flow in brain regions between the electrodes, and in particular the orientation of current flow relative to the cortical surface. - Letter
Dual-site high-density 4Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation applied over auditory and motor cortical speech areas does not influence auditory-motor mapping
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 12Issue 3p775–777Published online: January 18, 2019- Basil C. Preisig
- Matthias J. Sjerps
- Anne Kösem
- Lars Riecke
Cited in Scopus: 4Learning to speak and speaking require the continuous mapping of speech sounds onto articulatory motor plans (auditory-motor mapping). Previous studies using various techniques (histology, lesion mapping, diffusion tensor-imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation) have provided converging evidence for the relevance of a dorsal cortical processing stream, including auditory and motor areas, for auditory-motor mapping [1–4]. - Research Article
Motor training modulates intracortical inhibitory dynamics in motor cortex during movement preparation
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 12Issue 2p300–308Published online: November 8, 2018- J. Dupont-Hadwen
- S. Bestmann
- C.J. Stagg
Cited in Scopus: 16The primary motor cortex (M1) has a vital role to play in the learning of novel motor skills. However, the physiological changes underpinning this learning, particularly in terms of dynamic changes during movement preparation, are incompletely understood. In particular, a substantial decrease in resting gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) activity, i.e. a release of resting inhibition, is seen within M1 as a subject prepares to move. Although there is evidence that a decrease in resting inhibition occurs within M1 during motor learning it is not known whether the pre-movement “release” of GABAergic inhibition is modulated during skill acquisition. - Research Article
Vagus nerve stimulation intensity influences motor cortex plasticity
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 12Issue 2p256–262Published online: November 3, 2018- Robert A. Morrison
- Daniel R. Hulsey
- Katherine S. Adcock
- Robert L. Rennaker II
- Michael P. Kilgard
- Seth A. Hays
Cited in Scopus: 45Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with forelimb motor training enhances reorganization of movement representations in the motor cortex. Previous studies have shown an inverted-U relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in other brain areas, such that moderate intensity VNS yields greater cortical plasticity than low or high intensity VNS. However, the relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in the motor cortex is unknown. - Research Article
Multi-session anodal tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and postural stability in older adults with high fall risk: Primary motor cortex versus cerebellar stimulation
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 11Issue 6p1239–1250Published online: July 13, 2018- Mohaddeseh Hafez Yosephi
- Fatemeh Ehsani
- Maryam Zoghi
- Shapour Jaberzadeh
Cited in Scopus: 38Postural control impairment is a key target for rehabilitation of older adults with high fall risk. - Rapid Communication
Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulation of corticospinal excitability by targeting cortical I-waves with biphasic paired-pulses
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 11Issue 2p322–326Published online: October 20, 2017- Elisa Kallioniemi
- Petri Savolainen
- Gustaf Järnefelt
- Päivi Koskenkorva
- Jari Karhu
- Petro Julkunen
Cited in Scopus: 22Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced I-wave behavior can be demonstrated at neuronal population level using paired-pulses and by observing short-interval cortical facilitation (SICF). Advancements in stimulator technology have made it possible to apply biphasic paired-pulses to induce SICF. - Research Article
Where and what TMS activates: Experiments and modeling
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 11Issue 1p166–174Published online: September 26, 2017- Ilkka Laakso
- Takenobu Murakami
- Akimasa Hirata
- Yoshikazu Ugawa
Cited in Scopus: 65Despite recent developments in navigation and modeling techniques, the type and location of the structures that are activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) remain unknown. - Research Article
Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 10Issue 4p787–794Published online: March 31, 2017- Albino J. Oliveira-Maia
- Daniel Press
- Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Cited in Scopus: 31Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a treatment option for patients with medication-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). However, antidepressant response is variable and there are currently no response predictors with sufficient accuracy for clinical use. - Research Article
Cortical inhibitory and excitatory function in drug-naive generalized anxiety disorder
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 10Issue 3p604–608Published online: December 22, 2016- Cheng-Ta Li
- Chia-Feng Lu
- Hui-Ching Lin
- Ying-Zu Huang
- Chi-Hung Juan
- Tung-Ping Su
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 15A growing body of evidence suggests that deficits in GABAergic inhibitory and glutamatergic excitatory neurotransmission may be involved in the core pathophysiology of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), a disease characterized by pathological anxious worrying. The aim of the present study was to measure motor cortical excitability by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) in patients with GAD. - Research Article
Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: A brain stimulation study
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 10Issue 3p588–595Published online: December 8, 2016- Brenton Hordacre
- Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
- Ann-Maree Vallence
- Sam Darvishi
- Bahar Moezzi
- Masashi Hamada
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 76The potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for both probing human neuroplasticity and the induction of functionally relevant neuroplastic change has received significant interest. However, at present the utility of NIBS is limited due to high response variability. One reason for this response variability is that NIBS targets a diffuse cortical population and the net outcome to stimulation depends on the relative levels of excitability in each population. There is evidence that the relative excitability of complex oligosynaptic circuits (late I-wave circuits) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is useful in predicting NIBS response. - Research Article
Modulation of the Direction and Magnitude of Hebbian Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex by Stimulus Intensity and Concurrent Inhibition
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 10Issue 1p83–90Published online: August 12, 2016- R.F.H. Cash
- G. Jegatheeswaran
- Z. Ni
- R. Chen
Cited in Scopus: 20One of the most fascinating and important properties of the mammalian brain is its remarkable capacity for plasticity. Synaptic plasticity is considered to be the primary neuronal substrate for learning and memory [1]. As predicted in Hebb's postulate of associative plasticity in 1949 [2], synapses are strengthened if presynaptic activity precedes and contributes to postsynaptic firing, referred to as long term potentiation (LTP) [3], and weakened if the order is reversed, termed long term depression (LTD) [4]. - Research Article
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Educes Frequency-Specific Causal Relationships in the Motor Network
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 9Issue 3p406–414Published online: February 16, 2016- Felipe S. Salinas
- Crystal Franklin
- Shalini Narayana
- C. Ákos Szabó
- Peter T. Fox
Cited in Scopus: 16Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has the potential to treat brain disorders by modulating the activity of disease-specific brain networks. A prime example of this approach may be seen in the rTMS treatments of the fronto-limbic network of major depressive disorder [1–3], in which rTMS is delivered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to indirectly modulate the activity levels of the subgenual cingulate, which is too deep for standard rTMS coils to reach. Traditionally, rTMS rate has been applied in rTMS treatment protocols in either an inhibitory (≤1 Hz) or excitatory (>1 Hz) fashion [4,5], where it is assumed that these inhibitory or excitatory rTMS treatments affect the targeted brain networks in the same linear way – i.e. - Research Article
Reorganization of Motor Cortex by Vagus Nerve Stimulation Requires Cholinergic Innervation
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 9Issue 2p174–181Published online: January 8, 2016- Daniel R. Hulsey
- Seth A. Hays
- Navid Khodaparast
- Andrea Ruiz
- Priyanka Das
- Robert L. Rennaker II
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 87Neuromodulatory interventions have been extensively investigated as potential therapies to reverse maladaptive plasticity or boost limited plasticity to treat neurological disease. Recently, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as one such potential adjunctive intervention to enhance neuroplasticity [1]. Repeated presentation of auditory stimuli paired with short bursts of VNS drives long-lasting plasticity in auditory cortex [2–4]. Moreover, VNS paired with forelimb training drives robust, specific reorganization in motor cortex [5]. - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)/Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Original Article
Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 8Issue 5p906–913Published online: May 7, 2015- Ilkka Laakso
- Satoshi Tanaka
- Soichiro Koyama
- Valerio De Santis
- Akimasa Hirata
Cited in Scopus: 217The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. - Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Original Article
Intracortical Microstimulation (ICMS) Activates Motor Cortex Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons Mainly Transsynaptically
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 8Issue 4p742–750Published online: March 26, 2015- Ahmed T. Hussin
- Jeffery A. Boychuk
- Andrew R. Brown
- Quentin J. Pittman
- G. Campbell Teskey
Cited in Scopus: 23Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a technique used for a number of purposes including the derivation of cortical movement representations (motor maps). Its application can activate the output layer 5 of motor cortex and can result in the elicitation of body movements depending upon the stimulus parameters used. - Original Article
Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 7Issue 3p468–475Published online: February 18, 2014- Sarah Wiethoff
- Masashi Hamada
- John C. Rothwell
Cited in Scopus: 530Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Original Research
Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation: A Paired-Pulse TMS Study
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 7Issue 1p49–58Published online: September 12, 2013- Igor Delvendahl
- Hannes Lindemann
- Nikolai H. Jung
- Astrid Pechmann
- Hartwig R. Siebner
- Volker Mall
Cited in Scopus: 35Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can produce multiple descending volleys in fast-conducting corticospinal neurons, especially so-called indirect waves (I-waves) resulting from trans-synaptic excitation. Facilitatory interaction between these I-waves can be studied non-invasively using a paired-pulse paradigm referred to as short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF). - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Other Methods Original Article
Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in NeuromodulationVol. 6Issue 3p424–432Published online: June 4, 2012- Katia Monte-Silva
- Min-Fang Kuo
- Silvia Hessenthaler
- Shane Fresnoza
- David Liebetanz
- Walter Paulus
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 537Non-invasive brain stimulation enables the induction of neuroplasticity in humans, however, with so far restricted duration of the respective cortical excitability modifications. Conventional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols including one stimulation session induce NMDA receptor-dependent excitability enhancements lasting for about 1 h.